If you read this blog than there is a very high chance that you know about Nodalpoint. It was one of the first (community) blogs related to science and where many bioinformatic bloggers, myself included, started out. Over the years, the site lost usage as people started their own independent blogs and Greg Tyrelle, the creator of Nodalpoint, eventually archived it.
The main website is back, in a way. Greg decided to start up a podcast series to discuss issues around bioinformatics and I guess whatever else he might be interested in. Go check it out. The first episode is a conversation with Neil Saunders, one of Nodalpoint's early users (blog, friendfeed, twitter) .
Among many other things, they talk about the lack of traction that open science has among scientists. I agree with some of the points that were raised regarding the small size niche of each specific research problem. It is not the full answer but it probably plays a role. There are so few people that have the skills and interest to tackle the same problem that creating a online community around any given scientific question becomes hard. Still, if we have not come together to openly share results and methods we have at least witness the creation of many online communities that are working very well to discuss all sort of different scientific issues (ex. Friendfeed-Life Scientists, Biostart, Nature Network, etc).
A place to check what I have been reading and thinking about bioinformatics science and technology
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Friday, September 17, 2010
Systems Biology versus "real" biology
Scientific American has an article about this years' Lindau meeting of Nobel Laureates. It features an interesting conversations between Tim Hunt, Roland Pache (at the time PhD student) and undergraduate Sophia Hsing-Jung Li.
Here is the video of the conversation:
The discussion centered around systems biology and Hunt was not shy about expressing his skepticism. Since I happen to see great value in both the Omics and the design principles sort of work that characterize systems biology my frustration grew quickly. The whole video can be neatly summarize by Hunt's advice that people working in systems biology should "spend plenty of time talking to real biologists".
Real biologists ? ... I felt like writing a long rant about the findings that were made possible by the sort of work that he his so skeptical about but then I thought about xkcd and relaxed a bit:
Here is the video of the conversation:
The discussion centered around systems biology and Hunt was not shy about expressing his skepticism. Since I happen to see great value in both the Omics and the design principles sort of work that characterize systems biology my frustration grew quickly. The whole video can be neatly summarize by Hunt's advice that people working in systems biology should "spend plenty of time talking to real biologists".
Real biologists ? ... I felt like writing a long rant about the findings that were made possible by the sort of work that he his so skeptical about but then I thought about xkcd and relaxed a bit:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

